It's late, I've been cleaning my house all day, and now I have to go watch Fringe, so I'm going to cheat a bit on this one by rerunning a classic review that might help you decide what horror movie to watch this weekend. My review may sound a bit negative, but I think it is, in the end, a film I'm glad I saw, and actually want to watch again sometime soon. Also, continue to check out the 
Countdown to Halloween website, which has some great blogs taking part in the celebration. I've been reading some of them, and a lot of them are very entertaining. I know, this is cheap, but trust me, tomorrow's will make up for it. And there are some exciting things in the pipe for the rest of the month.
                                                "Classic" Review: Cthulhu
This last few weeks have marked the passage of the seventh annual  Anchorage International Film Festival, an event for which I was lucky  enough to be a judge(in one of the short film categories). This  presented me with a golden opportunity to attend every screening for  free. I was in heaven. Unfortunately, this happened to coincide with my  increasingly stupid looking decision to take on a second job for extra  holiday money. Coupled with normal familial duties, I was unable to  attend all but two films. The first of the two, Once, was  extraordinarily enjoyable, and I'll be writing about that one at a later  date. The second film, and subject of this post, was Cthulhu, a low  budget, DVE-shot horror film loosely based on HP Lovecraft's Shadow Over  Innsmouth.
In this filmed version, the main character, Russ, is a  gay history professor in Seattle who is called back to his home town of  Rivermouth when his mother passes away. Back in Rivermouth, Russ can't  wait to return to Seattle, finding nothing but antagonism from his  father(who leads the church of the Esoteric Order of Dagon) and the  townsfolk who view his sexuality as the height of mental degeneration.  His father, and indeed a few of the townspeople, take a very aggressive  interest in wanting to see Russ have children(for reasons I'll explain  later, but will probably make a bit of sense to people familiar with the  story). The only friendly face he sees is that of his childhood friend  Mike, a divorced father with whom he had a... sexually ambiguous  relationship growing up.  I suppose at this point something should be  said about the homosexual themes in this film, since the protagonist's  homosexuality is a large part of the plot both literally and  metaphorically. Russ' father is upset at his son not for being gay, it  seems, but for not having children, and metaphorically Russ'  homosexuality heightens the tension and fear of returning to a small  town, let alone one as bizarre as Rivermouth.
The plot(and I'm  going to give spoilers here, so if you haven't read the story, or want  to see this fresh, I'd suggest you skip ahead a paragraph) revolves  around Russ' heredity, and the Esoteric Order of Dagon that his father  leads. Dagon, as Lovecraft readers know, is one of the Deep Ones, a  fish-god that grants wealth to those who offer up human sacrifices.  There's also a lot of inter-species breeding going on, as the fish-men  mate with humans and produce immortal offspring, and the people  themselves begin to become more fish-like. Russ' family is so intent on  him having children because his family has long been the emissaries of  Cthulhu(although the church names Dagon, he is never specifically  mentioned in the movie, instead they use the more popularly known  Cthulhu), and they need him to father the next generation of fish-people  and pave the way for the return of the Deep Ones. This is a little  ill-defined in the movie, as much of the film is. A lot of it still  works, however, to heighten the confusion and fear, but at times is the  ambiguity is a bit off-putting. It works well when the characters are  confused and unsure of things, but when they seem completely aware of  everything and the audience is in the dark, it's a bit frustrating.
Now,  I'll be honest here and admit that my initial reaction as the film went  to black was 'god, what a mess!' The film is so jumbled and switches  scenes and tones at such a jarring rate that it seemed to me a horribly  confused mess. But, as the credits rolled, and that final image stuck  with me, and I thought back over the film, I realized that the film had  some very good ideas, but was slightly off the mark. The film feels one  or two drafts, and several days in the editing bay away from being a  really good film. The director, Dan Gildark,  was at the screening I  attended, and said that his distributor was imposing 8 minutes of edits  on him, and I really do think that with those trimmings the film could  be something special. Particularly, the flashbacks seem largely  unnecessary and confusing. There's a brief flashback of Russ entering a  room where a woman is crying, you see him with a shocked face as the  woman screams 'What did you do to me?' Later in the film Russ is seen  attempting suicide in flashback. Who was this woman? Was it his  sister(the only prominent female from his childhood we see)? What was  done to her? Did Russ attempt suicide because of this or some other  reason? It's not clear at all, although when I asked him the director  said there was a whole side story there that he cut out, choosing  instead to make that vague and mysterious. I think this was a mistake,  because without any context the flashbacks only serve to distract from  an already convoluted plot, and it seems like these scenes should be  important but there's absolutely no connection to the rest of the film.
But  let's focus on what does work. As I said, the idea of an ostracized gay  man returning home to face malevolent cosmic forces AND unfriendly  townspeople is well realized, and more literally turns the hero into  'the outsider', something the film is tactful enough not to hammer you  over the head about. The more mundane family and relationship moments  work very well, which is something that doesn't happen often in horror  movies. There's frequent, albeit brief, suggestions that place this  movie in the near future; radio programs talk about increasing violence  and ecological decay, one reports that the last surviving wild polar  bear had died in Siberia, and every television station seen in the  background has a 'breaking news' banner and blurry images of violent  events. This all serves to heighten the 'Lovecraftian' horror of the  story, with the madness being an ever present threat around the edges of  the characters lives until it forces it's way into the center stage.  The ever-present threat of rising ocean waters brings with it the  implication that the world of the Deep Ones will be coming to overtake  the world of man, which is a pretty clever twist.
Cthulhu was  shot on DVE, which gave the theatre image a slightly blurry, out of  focus look(I don't know if this will be the same for the image on a  smaller television set), but made the colors incredibly bright and pure.  This is a fairly low budget horror film, so anyone expecting a  horror-fest like the Stuart Gordon/Brian Yuzna Lovecraft adaptations is  going to be very disappointed. The effects, what little there are, are  only briefly glimpsed and, at one point, slightly cheesy. Instead this  film is more of a character driven drama with horror elements in it.  Some of the horror elements, unfortunately, rely a little too much on  the trappings of the genre, such as a scene where a little boy in front  of a staticy television screen says "we're waiting... for Cthulhu" and  the camera jump cuts a bit closer as he says Cthulhu. Or the crazy old  aunt in a mental ward who turns away from the character, towards the  camera as she starts over-emoting her forebodings of doom. Or a scene  with a weird glowing tentacle thing that would look cheap no matter  what, but is made slightly silly by the jump-cut and ominous, piercing  string music that accompanies it. All of these scenes are played with  such straight-faced seriousness that they stumble over the line and into  camp, and are at odds with the tone of the rest of the film.
Speaking  of things at odds with the film; Tori Spelling. The director had  nothing bad to say about Tori Spelling, but I wanted to comfort him and  give him my condolences that she was in this film, because her  completely over the top performance suggests an alien trying to emulate  femininity after watching hours of Marilyn Monroe, Betty Boop and really  bad porno dialogue. I might be a bit harsh on her, but she was really,  really unconvincing, and while her plotline was funny and integral, a  better actor would have focused the laughs on the humor in the script,  not the horrible line readings and unattractive come-ons. Aside from  her, I have nothing but good things to say about most of the cast.  Although some of the supporting characters ham it up a bit, the two male  leads are generally well suited to the parts they play.
So in  the end my rating for this film would put it around 3 out of 5 stars,  which may be a bit misleading. I don't dislike this film, in fact I  quite enjoyed it and plan on seeing it again when it gets an official  distribution. But, due to some jarring tonal shifts and jumbled plotting  it didn't fully engage me. I have high hopes that a slightly edited  version, released in the spring, will improve my rating for this film.  The director mentioned as his influences the films of Japanese directors  Takashi Miike and Kyoshi Kurosawa. Miike I didn't spot, but anyone who  enjoys the glacial pace and subtle horror of Kurosawa's  films(particularly Charisma, a film I should admit I understand not a  goddamn bit) will probably find a lot here to enjoy.
One last  thing should be said about the sexual themes in this movie; I've been  lurking around in the wastelands of the IMDB comment board, seeing what  people had to say about this film. Many are purists upset at the  liberties taken with the source material, and angered by the lack of  tentacled monsters and outright scares(there are a few in Cthulhu, but  that isn't the main focus), but a surprising amount of them are angered  by the fact that the film has a publicly gay main character. This is  upsetting, and surprising to me because I assumed that anyone  open-minded enough to read Lovecraft, with his mind-bending mythology  that isn't exactly Judea-christian friendly, should be open-minded  enough to deal with a movie where two men kiss(yes, there is a love  scene, and although it will gross many people out, it is filmed with  more class, tenderness and romanticism than most heterosexual love  scenes, and has 100% less testicles than Borat did). Some have argued  that Lovecraft didn't write about sex at all, and so it should be left  out of any filmed adaptations. And while that's true to a point, it  should be mentioned that many of his stories dealt indirectly with  bestiality. What is The Shadow Over Innsmouth about, if not a bunch of  fishermen having sex with fish?